Trio Cleared Over 7/7 Attacks Options

[Fremen Bryan]

Trio cleared over 7/7 attacks

• Trio cleared
• Flawed trials
• The bomber
• Victims reflect
• In pictures
• Reaction

Waheed Ali, Sadeer Saleem and Mohammed Shakil denied the charge Three men have been cleared of helping to plan the 7/7 London suicide attacks.

A retrial jury at Kingston Crown Court found them not guilty of conspiring with the 2005 bombers by organising a reconnaissance mission to London.

Waheed Ali, 25, Sadeer Saleem, 28, and Mohammed Shakil, 32, all from Leeds, admitted knowing the bombers - but denied helping them.

Ali and Shakil were found guilty of a second charge of plotting to attend a terrorism training camp in Pakistan.

The men were originally tried in 2008, but the first jury failed to reach verdicts against them.

Those now found guilty will be sentenced on Wednesday.

The three men are the only people to face any charges in relation to the 7/7 London bombings.

7/7 Investigation in numbers


90,000 phone calls examined 4,700 phone numbers probed 13,000 exhibits 7,000 forensically examined 18,450 statements taken 19,400 documents created
In Pictures: 7/7 investigation During the three-month retrial, the jury heard that the trio, all close friends of the bombers, had been key members of a tight circle around ringleader Mohammad Sidique Khan.

All three, the jury was told, shared a violent jihadist ideology.

Prosecutors in both trials had claimed that the men's movements in London mirrored a scouting trip by the bombers and included sites ultimately attacked.

Neil Flewitt QC had told the trial that the case centred on circumstantial evidence which, he argued, created a compelling picture of guilt.

But the trio maintained throughout the trial - and during tense evidence from the witness box - that they ideologically opposed suicide bombings and had been shocked by the attacks.

Counsel for the men told the jury there was no evidence linking them to the bombings and that they were being tried for guilt by association.

Mr Flewitt said a December 2004 trip to London lay at the heart of the case because the three men, accompanied by two of the eventual suicide attackers, had used it to visit a number of possible targets.

'Witch-hunt'

The prosecution said the group's movements bore a "striking similarity" to the final targets.

But the men told the jury that the trip had been organised because Waheed Ali was planning to leave the country for militant training in Pakistan.

He and Sadeer Saleem were going to join the future bombers Mohammed Sidique Khan and Shehzad Tanweer, who had already left.

He wanted to say goodbye to his sister, who lived in the capital. The others, the court heard, had simply gone along for the ride.

Ali and the other two defendants had attacked the trials as a witch-hunt, motivated by a determination to see someone pay for the murders.

Advertisement Trio cleared over 7/7 attacks

The three men acquitted were arrested in 2007 amid the largest criminal investigation yet in the UK. But the 2008 trial reached a stalemate after almost three weeks of deliberations by the first jury.

After Sadeer Saleem's release by the court, his solicitor, Imran Khan, read out a statement on his behalf, in which Mr Saleem supported calls by families of the bombing victims for a public inquiry.

We are not looking for people to blame, but we also know that we have not been told the whole truth
Graham Foulkes, father of bombing victim
Reaction to the verdict "I must make it absolutely clear that I had nothing whatsoever to do with the dreadful attacks on 7 July 2005, which I have always condemned," he said.

Home Secretary Jacqui Smith said she welcomed the two guilty verdicts.

"It clearly demonstrates the determined stance the UK takes against those suspected of involvement in terrorism," she said.

Graham Foulkes, whose 22-year-old son David was killed in the Edgware Road Tube explosion, has called for a public inquiry into the bombings.

He said: "For almost four years we have been asking for an inquiry into what led up to 7/7.

"We are not looking for people to blame, but we also know that we have not been told the whole truth.

"We believe that crucial lessons need to be learned. If mistakes have been made, they should be put right, not covered up. This is not a witch-hunt, it is simply about saving lives."

Community fears

Tens of thousands of police hours have been spent on the four-year investigation - and detectives maintain there are people in the Leeds area who know more that could help them.

The defendants accused the police and media of creating a climate of fear in the Beeston area of Leeds, where they live.

Sadeer Saleem's solicitor Imran Khan reads out a statement after the acquittal

West Yorkshire Police assistant chief constable John Parkinson said "intensive scrutiny" from police, public and media had put pressure on the residents of Beeston, and also Dewsbury, where some of the 7/7 bombers lived.

He added: "Local people were very supportive of the investigation, both immediately after the event and in the many months that followed.

"The attacks on 7/7 have shown us that we all need to work together if we are to effectively respond to the threat of terrorism."

Deputy assistant commissioner John McDowall, head of the Metropolitan Police Counter Terrorism Command, called for anyone with information about the attacks to come forward.

"While those directly responsible for the bombings died in the attacks, we remain convinced that others must have been involved in the planning," he said.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7507842.stm

This post has been edited by Fremen Bryan: Apr 28 2009, 03:42 PM

[Fremen Bryan]

Kingston re-trial outcome

Submitted by A Friend on Wed, 04/29/2009 - 17:13

On Tuesday 28th April 2009, the Kingston re-trial jury unanimously REFUSED to convict Waheed Ali, Mohammed Shakil and Sadeer Saleem, of helping to plot the 7/7 attacks, finding them not guilty. They have spent over two years in prison. Muad'Dib sent the 7/7 Ripple Effect DVD's to the judge, laywers and jury (whom the judge had misled) of the first trial at Kingston, because they should never have been accused in the first place and had no case to answer. They should never have spent all that time in prison.

However, the following day, on Wednesday 29th April 2009, Waheed Ali and Mohammed Shakil were unjustly sentenced to seven years, for "planning to attend a terror training camp in Pakistan". One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter. Looking at the atrocious acts of mass terrorism committed by the United States and Britain over the years, together murdering over a million people, it is difficult to see how armed forces from other nations who have spent time training in the USA or Britain, should not logically be accused of the same thing.

http://mtrial.org/news/290409-kingston-re-trial-outcome


This post has been edited by Fremen Bryan: Apr 30 2009, 06:31 PM